How a Real “War Within Islam” Would Look

Andrew Bostom wrote me,
"This piece lays bare much of what I believe to be the sheerest sophistry (if not deliberate deceit, and hypocrisy) emanating form those who argue there is a so-called "War Within Islam."  The absurd and offensive pronouncements by Muslim apologists (most notably, the OIC itself) and their useful idiot abettors in the aftermath of Mumbai made clear to me that this  "paradigm" had to be tested against  reality."

How a Real “War Within Islam” Would Look
December 11th, 2008

Will “Elkie” Ihsanoglu Lead the OIC Lodge Against “Anti-Islamic Terrorists” in Pakistan’s “Lawless Tribal Belt”?


“Cynicism” and “calculated
misuse,” versus attacks entirely consistent with the
uniquely Islamic institution of jihad war (including jihad terrorism) across a
13-century continuum
, notwithstanding, I agree with Ganor’s admonition that
it is “primarily” the responsibility of “the Muslim world itself” to confront
jihadism. But it was documentary
filmmaker Sean Langan’s harrowing account (just
reported in the NY Daily News 12/6/08
) of his three-month captivity by a
resurgent Taliban/Al Qaeda within Pakistan (in the so-called “lawless
tribal belt
”), along the Afghanistan border, that clarified how a moral,
intellectually honest, and concrete “war within Islam” should be waged, without
delay. Langan has identified—once again—those who must be the obvious targets of
a campaign by Muslims to “reclaim Islam” from radical, barbaric “hijackers” of
their faith.

Jailed in the cramped, dark
room of a house, Langan heard the constant sound of machine guns, mortars and
grenades, accompanied by the steady hum of U.S. Predator drones overhead. “I was
in a valley surrounded by training camps, bases and caves. Arabs were having
meetings there—Al Qaeda—making plans,” Langan
told NY Daily News reporter James Meek
. One of Langan’s captors explained,
bluntly “We are meeting and
discussing global jihad issues.”
The captured filmmaker recalled
listening to an ex-Pakistani minister on the BBC one day denying Al Qaeda
operated camps inside the country. “I had to turn up the radio to hear his
denial over the sound of gunfire from all the training camps,” Langan, smiling,
told the Daily News reporter. “The world’s leading terrorists are there –safe,
and with the time to plot and plan attacks,” Langan asserted. During his
captivity Langan also became convinced of the jihadists utterly depraved
indifference to human life. He was shown the photograph of a bomb-laden young child blowing up a U.S. Humvee, and
just prior to escaping, Langan was forced to view jihadist sniper and beheading
videos with the toddler son of a jihadist.

Pakistani President Asif Ali
Zardari, in the wake of the Mumbai massacre wrote a December 9, 2008 New York Times Op-Ed entitled, “The
Terrorists Want to Destroy Pakistan, Too
.” Zardari at least acknowledged the
significant presence of Al Qaeda in his country, claimed to be committed to the
fight against this jihad terrorist organization—perhaps even more so than
NATO—and sought worldwide support for his efforts:

The challenge of confronting
terrorists who have a vast support network is huge; Pakistan’s fledgling
democracy needs help from the rest of the world. We are on the frontlines of the
war on terrorism. We have 150,000 soldiers fighting Al Qaeda, the Taliban and
their extremist allies along the border with Afghanistan — far more troops than
NATO has in Afghanistan

Ignoring serious concerns
about the dubious
use of some $5 billion in US military aid
to Pakistan (via Coalition Support
Funds) since 2002—ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda and its allies in the tribal
areas—I maintain that Zardari’s plaintive appeal for assistance—military and
financial—be heeded primarily, if not exclusively by
Muslim nations
from the now 57 member Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC).

After all, the OIC Dakar
of March 13-14, 2008 from the 11th Session of
the Islamic Summit Conference
has sworn the 57 Muslim nations to combat
terrorism. The OIC statement even highlights a convention assembled for this
purpose, along with “other international initiatives by the Islamic geographical sphere,” citing this involvement
as proof of its unequivocal willingness “…to fight against the heinous
phenomenon [of terrorism],” and the global Muslim organization’s “total
rejection of it [terrorism].” However, in a statement issued 12/2/08 (“Islam, the
religion of peace, tolerance and compassion
”), shortly after the murderous
attacks in Mumbai, the OIC, while mentioning, “…the multiplicity of terrorist
attacks perpetrated recently by deviant and fanatic individuals,” decried the

…tendency of a section
of the media, to interpose the word ‘Islam’ in reporting these incidences..
maliciously trying to establish conceptual link between such evil and wicked
practices and Islam, the religion that condemns, scorns and outlaws them…Those
who refer to the perpetrators, as acting on behalf of Islam, help them by
offering them justification, anchor and premise that they don’t have or deserve.
On the other hand, the generalization of the guilt of a few aberrant misguided
individuals, to engulf the adherents of a religion of 1.5 billion followers is
an outrageous judgment and amounts to an illegal collective punishment on a
global scale. Moreover, any attempt to implicate all Muslims in such a wicked
and wanton acts goes contrary to the well established principles of
international law. It is therefore hoped that media will avoid resorting to any
reference to Islam when narrating such events in order not to disseminate
erroneous information that might jeopardize the basic human rights of Muslims,
the world over.

But the 12/2/08 OIC
statement also insisted,

Islam, the religion of
peace, tolerance and compassion, that sanctifies the human soul, and whose
universal message is one of mutual peaceful coexistence among all the peoples of
the world, regardless of their ethnicities, race, religions or languages, and
which calls for kind reasoning and dialogue with all their fellow human
beings, abhors and despises all such criminal acts and had enacted the
utmost severe punishment for their

argue that the OIC—currently headed by its Turkish representative Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu—is uniquely suited to marshall the military and economic might to
“enact the utmost severe punishment” for Al Qaeda and Taliban “perpetrators” of
“anti-Islamic” acts of terrorism. Turkey and Egypt—key OIC member states—have
large, modern, well-equipped armed forces (here;
here; here),
including air forces (here; here),
and both nations are believed to have been victimized by Al Qaeda attacks (here;
and here).
These Muslim nations—with formal, enthusiastic sanctioning by the OIC—should
send large military contingents to reinforce the
“150,000” of their Pakistani Muslim brethren under President Zadari
doggedly engaged in combating the “anti-Islamic” terrorists of Al Qaeda and the
Taliban on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Read it all. Learn everything.

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Pin It on Pinterest