Terror-Tied CAIR Hosts First US Appearance of Banned, Cold-Blooded Jihadist Tariq Ramadan

The face of evil

Tariq Ramdan now symbolizes the view, as Jacques Jormier, one of the leading Islam
experts, puts it: 'that does not modernize Islam but Islamizes
modernity.' Lee Smith wrote
in The American Prospect, he is a cold-blooded Islamist
whose "cry of death to the West is a quieter and gentler jihad,
but it's still jihad."

First U.S. Appearance–Tariq Ramadan to Speak at
6th Annual CAIR-Chicago Banquet

CAIR-Chicago is pleased to announce that Professor Tariq Ramadan will
be the keynote speaker at its 6^th Annual Banquet on April
10, 2010. The appearance of Professor Ramadan will be a milestone for
the American Muslim community since he was banned from visiting the
United States almost six years ago.  Late last month Secretary of State
Hilary Clinton signed an order revoking Professor Ramadan’s visa ban.

In 2004, Ramadan, a Swiss citizen who is currently a professor of
Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford University had been offered a
tenured teaching position at the University of Notre Dame when the Bush
administration revoked his visa citing unsubstantiated ties to terrorism
and minor charitable contributions made by Professor Ramadan as reason
for the visa revocation.

Civil rights activists accused the Bush Administration of using the
Patriot Act to silence foreign scholars who were critical of their
foreign and domestic policies by refusing their entry into the country
to speak or teach.

Ramadan said in a published statement regarding Secretary Clinton’s
reversal of the visa ban, “The decision brings to an end a dark period
in American politics that saw security considerations invoked to block
critical debate through a policy of exclusion and baseless allegation.”

Yes, what right do infidels have to security considerations? Our future belongs to Islam, according to these killers.

Olivier Guitta writes here in the American Thinker that Osama
bin Laden studied with Tariq's father in Geneva, suggesting that the future terrorist and the future
scholar might have known each other.

And Daniel Pipes writes this (and Pipes to generally soft sells this madness) has this: