The New York Times: Outraged, Outrageous and Unhinged

371

As expected, the New York Times did an extraordinarily nasty and fallacious piece on me. It is full of distortions, inaccuracies and lies from beginning to end.

the actual interview, which is, frankly, all that really matters. But let's have a cursory look at this piece, shall we?

The numbers quoted from my divorce settlement are grossly, wildly inaccurate. I don't want to air dirty laundry in public, but there is absolutely no truth to what Anne Barnard and Alan Feuer "reported" about this. And although I do not want to get into personal matters, how do they know that my deceased ex "didn’t always agree" with what I was saying? Did they employ a ouija board? Just for knowing, this claim also is patently false.

Story continues below advertisement

Of course they hold up my lack of journalistic "credentials" as a disadvantage. Clearly we see how this "advantage" has rendered the New York Times and the rest of the fraternity of credentialed journalists hopelessly inaccurate and incapable of objectivity and responsible journalism. Why no piece like this on Daisy Khan, or Feisal Abdul Rauf, or Sharif El-Gamal?

Here is credentialed journalism: they say without explanation that I "posted doctored pictures of Nazi helmet." They don't bother to mention that the Kagan photoshop came after it was revealed that Kagan had cited in her thesis a German Marxist who became a Nazi when Hitler took power. They claim that I said that "a young 'a crack whore,'" without mentioning that in that post I was making a point about unfair journalists (like these Times writers), constructing a reductio ad absurdum about media bias.

Just to show how avid and careful they were in their quest for the facts, they have me video blogging from an Israeli beach. Won't Fort Lauderdale be surprised to find out that the Zionist war machine is now occupying Florida beaches? Richer still was their reference to "arching her bikini-bared back provocatively." Please. I was submerged in the water with my kids in the background. Talk about easily titillated! I never arched my back except to swim away. They've been spending too much time with the Taliban. And they fault me for equating Palestinians with Hamas. The Palestinians elected Hamas, but who cares?

I know they spoke to Pamela Hall, but she is not mentioned in the article. They asked her what my worst traits were, but she must not have given them any grist for their mill.

It's revealing how many times they refer to my "Long Island-accented voice" and upbringing. It says more about them than it does about me. It's elitist, it's snobbish, and it's condescending.

But while they have room for that, you'll notice that the Muslim Brotherhood is nowhere mentioned in this piece, although I referred to them extensively. Even when they referred to the halal Campbell's Soup story, they declined to mention ISNA or the Muslim Brotherhood, only referring to a nameless Islamic group. Why is the New York Times so solicitous or afraid of the Muslim Brotherhood, that they won't mention its name? Nor do they mention the mega-mosque's earlier name, Cordoba Initiative, although it was only known as such for many months.

They refer to my work as a "crusade," but never refer to the supremacists' jihad as anything nefarious. They refer to my work as waging "a form of holy war," but never, ever discuss the real holy war against the West.

They say Paypal branded me a hate site. I know that facts are irrelevant, but they didn't.

In talking about my role in the mosque controversy, they say:

Two days later, Ms. Geller invited readers to protest the “9/11 monster mosque being built on hallowed ground zero,” in a post that was among the first to spread the misimpressions that the project was at the World Trade Center site and would solely house a prayer space.

Who's misimpressioning here? The site of the building is Ground Zero. You can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts. That building was hit by the landing gear from one of the planes, and destroyed. It is part of the Ground Zero attack site. And I never said that the building would solely house a prayer space. (Note "prayer space": the Times can't bring itself to call it a mosque, even though the prayer space in this building will be a mosque.)

Even the links they provide are deliberately deceptive. When deriding me for calling Sharif El-Gamal a thug, they don't link to his rap sheet or his threatening of a moderate Muslim. They only link to the post about his being a tax deadbeat, which is not about his thuggishness.

They minimize the mortal threat to Rifqa Bary's life, mischaracterizing her father's death threat to her for leaving Islam for Christianity as Rifqa having "accused her parents of abuse." They say I helped draw "vociferous objectors to a hearing this summer on a since-scrapped proposal for a mosque on Staten Island." Here again, they make no mention of the fact that it was a Muslim Brotherhood mosque. "Vociferous objectors" is Times-speak for patriots and defenders of freedom.

As far as the public school madrassa in Brooklyn goes, I referred extensively to Pamela Hall's seminal work. She was responsible for taking what should have been a Pulitzer-Prize-winning picture of the Almontaser-sanctioned "Intifada NYC" t-shirt. They quote the head of the school, Dabah Almontaser, saying: “New York is the cosmopolitan city of the world. They figured that if they could do it here, they could do it anywhere. And sadly, they did.” Do what? Fight for justice? Stand up against the jihad against Israel? Stand up against a public school being made into a madrassa? I would do it again. And going to Almontaser for her take on the madrassa is like going to the fox for his take on the henhouse.

They gave space to hit-and-run insults from anonymous people at the New York Observer, which was swarming with doctrinaire leftists like Mike Tomasky and Joe Conason, and note: they made no mention of the fact that I worked all my life, from the time I was thirteen. I worked full-time from the time I was seventeen. My high school was on split session; I got out at noon and worked til eight. I worked through college, and never stopped working until I left to raise my children in my late thirties. "Socialite," my eye!

The New York Times said: "And Ms. Geller said, without evidence, that the center’s financing might be tied to terrorists." We know that Rauf is a leading member of the Perdana Organization, the single largest financier of the Turkish terrorist group's jihad flotilla against Israel. Rauf and Daisy Khan have received funding from the Xenel Corporation. The connection between Xenel and al Qaeda, according to the Orlando Sentinel, was persuasive enough that the city of Orlando decided to cancel the contract it had previously awarded to Xenel. The involvement Bin Laden-tied Xenel led to the cancellation of a different 100-million-dollar project in Florida. If such ties would cancel a convention center, why not a 100-million-dollar Islamic supremacist mega mosque at the site of largest attack on American soil by these same players? And yet the Times says I have no evidence.

They ridicule the idea of taqiyya, calling it "the hiding of true beliefs, religiously sanctioned for Muslims, usually minority Shiites, under hostile rule." They don't mention that the idea of religious deception in Islam is not just held by Shi'ites, but is founded on the Koran, which tells Muslims that they can pretend to be friends with unbelievers to "guard themselves against them" (3:28). A hadith explains this as meaning "We smile in the faces of some people, but behind their backs we curse them." That sounds like Rauf, with his love for religious dialogue in English and rejection of it in Arabic, to me.

They claim that I am branding Rauf a "radical Islamist," when in fact his own words are those of a radical: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the  US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it." Referring to jihadis, he says: "How do you tell people whose homes have been destroyed, whose lives have been destroyed, that this does not justify your actions of terrorism? It's hard. Yes, it is true that it does not justify the acts of bombing innocent civilians, that does not solve the problem, but after 50 years of, in many cases, oppression, of US support of authoritarian regimes that have violated human rights in the most heinous of ways, how else do people get attention?" Rauf calls Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi "a very very well known Islamic jurist, highly regarded all over the Muslim world" — Qaradawi has approved of Palestinian suicide bombings and genocide of the Jews. It was on Qaradawi's authority that Hamas began to use women in suicide attacks. He has called for "drastic" punishment of homosexuals. (Video here.)

They refer to the pain expressed by those who oppose the Ground Zero mega mosque as "heckling." And I had to laugh, of course, when the New York Times said that Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin were getting their talking points from me. Has anyone told Rush yet?

Barnard and Feuer write, "Opposition to Park51 grew — and with it, antipathy for Islam." It wasn't "antipathy for Islam" — that is more of that racist-Islamophobic-anti-Muslim nonsense. It was outrage at the lack of compassion and sensitivity to the pain and the grief the mega mosque organizers were causing. To suggest that I provided the vocabulary to express this grief, under the guise of "worries about Islam," is laughable. It is justifiable concern about slaughter in the name of jihad, Islamic supremacism, the subjugation of women, and gender apartheid. The dead can't speak.

They're snarky about anyone who goes off the reservation, but they actually refer to the disinformationalists and propagandists of Media Matters as a "media tracking group," and not the left-wing propaganda hate site that it is, void of facts — like this article. They say: "Her claims were disputed often enough that the liberal media-tracking group Media Matters called on stations (ineffectually) to stop presenting her as an expert." They do not and cannot, however, cite one example where I was actually wrong; instead, they just resort to ad hominem attacks. The Times is implying in this that I was so inaccurate that the smear machine Media Matters called on stations to stop featuring me in the interests of accuracy, when actually Media Matters was afraid that some of the truth was getting out to the public despite their best efforts. That they mention Loonwatch, a Goebbels-style hate site, speaks volumes.

And they say this about the EDL: "Ms. Geller went on to champion as patriotic the English Defense League, which opposes the building of mosques in Britain and whose members have been photographed wearing swastikas. (In the interview, Ms. Geller said the swastika-wearers must have been “infiltrators” trying to discredit the group.)" They don't mention that the EDL unequivocally supports Israel, waves the Israeli flag, has a Jewish division, has Hindu and Sikh members, and does have an ongoing problem with leftist infiltrators joining their rallies in order to try to discredit them by making racist or neo-Nazi statements.

They expose themselves completely when brushing over the death of Aqsa Parvez. They never mention why she didn't have a headstone in the first place (because she brought dishonor to the family, which is why she was murdered, and that dishonor did not merit her being remembered after death). They put "honor killings" in quotes, as if it were something I made up. In all their combing through my site, they seem to have missed this post. Is it any wonder that these reporters don't understand the whole idea of compassion and decency in regard to the Ground Zero mosque, when they put the term "honor killings" in quotes?

One thing the Times got right: the picture of me accompanying the article is accurate!

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
371 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
madmath1
madmath1
13 years ago

This is why I wouldn’t do interviews. Remember the story of the Native and the scorpion. It’s too much in the media’s nature to be evil, deceptive, and downright nasty. No sense in having trust in those that are untrustworthy.

Person of the Book
Person of the Book
13 years ago

Pam, the article said that you’re 52 and single!
Oh wait, I’m married.
Speaking of the article, they called Rifqa Bary a “muslim”. That is definitely a lie, because by Rifqa’s own words, she is a Christian.

wmm
wmm
13 years ago

You don’t have “traditional academic, public-policy or journalism credentials”?! You FRAUD! I tried to read to the end but lost interest halfway through and skimmed the rest. You know, like the NYT does with its reporting.

juniper
juniper
13 years ago

Dear Pam, you are beautiful, successful, you speak the truth, you have a lovely family and are blessed with 4 children – plus you have some money. May God continue to bless you! You deserve everything!!
One thing they WERE right about: that islamonazism is at least as dangerous as Communism was during the Cold
War – AND STILL IS! And for exposing that horror we have you, Robert and the very few, to thank!
This article betrays the twisted envy of the psychotic haters in the MSM. May they rot in crocodile-infested hell!!
NFSE!!

Dawn
Dawn
13 years ago

Don’t worry Pam..we all know the truth..and we all know the N.Y. Times is slanting the truth to fit it’s agenda.

aprilnovember811
aprilnovember811
13 years ago

Pam,
I can’t read the article, but I agree with what madmath1 said… They are wasting your precious time. Like Mark Levin said, during WWII they buried the holocaust in the back pages of their newspaper. Speaking with these people is like speaking with Satan himself. They are demons.
I told someone, Obama, all of these Radical Islamic groups, and papers like the NYT remind me of a scene in the movie the Exorcist, The young priest Damien was trying to exorcise the demon from Reagan. The demon suddenly spoke like Damien’s mother, and looked like his mother. He said things to try to make Damien feel guilty, like, “Damie, why did you do this to me, and why did you leave me alone?” The priest couldn’t take it anymore, and suddenly tried to strangle Reagan, only to regain his composure, and jumped out of the window killing himself. These people are just as demonic. They will draw you in, and then try to make you the evil doer.
My suggestion. Tell them, you have no time to waste speaking with the Devil. Let them write whatever they do. Intelligent people don’t rely on demonic forces like them. They do their own research, and find out the truth themselves. The internet is such a wonderful thing.

Dinah Kanser
Dinah Kanser
13 years ago

Well said!

LL
LL
13 years ago

I don’t read the NYT. I don’t consider that they have much to say that is either valid, timely or worth reading.
I know that some people do, but I’m tired of their liberal agenda in everything they write. Their bias is so abundantly clear that I simply don’t tolerate it anymore. I turn them off.
I’m sorry that they trashed you — but not at all surprised.

madmath1
madmath1
13 years ago

April, thanks for putting the theme of my 2 sentence to much greater clarity 😀

madmath1
madmath1
13 years ago

She’s truly Christian by choice, not like the President who’s really Islamic by choice it seems.

Diane
Diane
13 years ago

If this piece is an example of what passes for “Journalistic Credentials”, it is no wonder so many people flock to websites such as yours and Robert’s out of desperation to get at the truth. I actually became nauseous reading it, especially when they quoted Charles Johnson. Fortunately, most people do a little research, unlike the “experts” in the mainstream media.

Northstar
Northstar
13 years ago

I only use the NYT’s to put under my cat’s litterbox. ; > )

friend
friend
13 years ago

The publicity is good. They can smear you, but if enough of your own words get out, they’ll resonate with people. Or they’ll be curious enough to checkout your blog. I admire your endurance and ability to carry on despite the smears and threats.

Rodney
Rodney
13 years ago

I say put this here thread at the top of your blog for a while, since even those who read the NYT with pleasure will check out your blog as a result–and see your answer to that smear job.

Person of the Book
Person of the Book
13 years ago

For the NYT to call her a “muslim” means that they agree with the notion that “once a muslim, always a muslim”. I wonder where they got that idea from?

Robert L
Robert L
13 years ago

If the MSM spent as much time investigating/hatcheting Obama and his crew as it does on slamming dedicated individuals like yourself, maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess.

Felix_the_Infidel
Felix_the_Infidel
13 years ago

In my opinion, you think waaayyy too highly of the NYT. 🙂

Raymond
Raymond
13 years ago

A word to Northstar: If 8,000,000 people buy the NYT and use it in the cat’s litterbox, they will stay in business. To Pam, we know you and your work. It is very much appreciated and I’m speaking from far-away Newfoundland, Canada. Will be in NY in December though. I use many of your stories on my FB pages (Izlamic) and (Friends of the United States of America) being two of them.

Felix_the_Infidel
Felix_the_Infidel
13 years ago

Ms. Geller, if it is any consolation, the picture is AWESOME!

Davida
Davida
13 years ago

Pamela, please tell me that this interview didn’t take place in your home, because I wouldn’t trust these quislings to “accidently” reveal your address to their jihadi friends.

Steve
Steve
13 years ago

And people are wondering why O-Bozo and crew want an “internet kill switch.”
If there ever comes a move to suspend the Constitution and implement Marshal Law, they HAVE to kill the main path of dissemination of information that is not censored or outright blocked.
Wake up and smell the coffee folks, the Lame Stream Media is dying because like the scorpion, “they can’t help themselves,” and because of the internet, people are finding out in droves “what they’ve been missing.”

Always On Watch
Always On Watch
13 years ago

I wouldn’t have expected anything else from the NYT.
Pamela, you were brave to have given the interview in the first place!

MJ
MJ
13 years ago

What can you expect from the The New Islamic Times?
Keep up your important work, Pam. You were courageous to grant them the interview.

The Spoonman
The Spoonman
13 years ago

Who reads the NYT ?

Northstar
Northstar
13 years ago

To Raymond……
Who say’s I buy it? ; > )

Safti
Safti
13 years ago

Dear Pamela~
Your daughters must be very proud of their Mama. What a great example you are setting for the next generation! You know where the NYT can go? You are greatly appreciated by so many the world over and the MSM is failing…big time.

Northstar
Northstar
13 years ago

Felix…..Ha Ha..Yes my cat has been complaining as of late. He wants a better newspaper for his ” leavings “

HelyeahWinnie
HelyeahWinnie
13 years ago

I LOVE YOU XXXXOOO!!! *smooch*

Dagny Taggart
Dagny Taggart
13 years ago

Please Pam….as one of the leading propaganda organs of this administration and its handlers, the NY Times and its ilk (prime time “news” programs) will never give you fair shake, so why waste your precious time?
It’s a learning curve. But you’re a “broad” (one of the best terms to describe a strong woman, IMO) you can handle the crap they throw your way. They’re like monkeys in a zoo and they are flinging away.
xoxo

Joe C
Joe C
13 years ago

Pamela, the picture is great!
Go Pamela, go!

juniper
juniper
13 years ago

BTW, the New York Times are a lying bunch of nazis: here is the EDL today at Leicester:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2VrK8EAHuU

sheik yer'mami
sheik yer'mami
13 years ago

Ah yes, the New Yawk Slimes!
The commie rag that gave us Walther Duranty and that other ‘Nobel Price’ winner Paul Krugman, who would tax us all to death for his marxist utopia. Who would expect anything but dreck and smears from these Alinsky’ite swine?
Btw:your website is here in Australia classified as “fascism” and no longer available in public outlets (hotels, internet cafe’s etc)
Mine is classified as “female genital mutilation” (its like we’re promoting it rather than opposing) and therefore you can’t access it.
Conroy/KRudd’s censorship is well on the way……..

Wanglese
Wanglese
13 years ago

I love that they bring up your lack of “journalistic credentials”. Where have they been for the last 9 years?
The world of information and news has changed.
You keep on doing what you are doing.
The NY Times is an irrelevant dinosaur – and something along the lines of an apatosaurus. Big, Successful for a long time, but ultimately doomed when the environment changed because it simply could not adapt to the changed conditions.
Let us remember that they, like most newspapers have stopped reporting the news “without fear or favour”. Instead they try to promote thier own agenda.

Cate
Cate
13 years ago

A big sloppy raspberry to the NYT. People know this rag for what it is. Regardless of the trash they printed, I still think it’s great they did the interview. The more media exposure you get, the better. It’s all about educating the public about the insidiousness of radical Islam in our midst. I think a whole lot of people out there have more than 1 brain cell firing, and know a smear when they see one.

Robin Shadowes
Robin Shadowes
13 years ago

Only do intervies if it is broadcasted live and thus can’t be edited to make the interviewed look back. They could however have sly and skilled interviewers so I recommend to atch out anyway.

Robin Shadowes
Robin Shadowes
13 years ago

Use the koran instead. That’s all it’s good for. Except maybe your kitty might complain about it though.

FishEagle
FishEagle
13 years ago

I read the whole thing. I found it exciting to learn more about you, Pamela. The left’s bias was obvious, but that didn’t matter. You were one of the first idols that I discovered on the web. P.S. I never did find any idols in the mainstream media. I guess an education was too much of a responsibility for the ‘qualified’ journalists to handle.

Northstar
Northstar
13 years ago

Yes Pamela….they got one thing right….Your photograph…..You are both beautiful on the inside and the outside!!!!!

Monica
Monica
13 years ago

Liberal Media loves women as long as they fit into their sterio-typical pant suit wearing butt ugly feminists’ mold. They hate attractive conservative females who refuse to bow down and submit to their liberal male MSM masters, give them hell Pam they aren’t worth the ink they use to print their smears. Muslim women in Europe have been abandoned by the self same liberal MSM and politicians because in the end the left use us and toss us aside for their new bestest buds Islamic Supremacists. Gays, Jews and women have been tossed into the liberal trash heap in Europe why? Because the left use us to advance their political cause and then toss us aside like trash when they find another group to label victim victim victim.

rachelle
rachelle
13 years ago

Pamela, I thought you were maybe 40. You look great. Knowing more than a few diehard NYT readers, they are now wondering if converting to being pro-Pamela Geller will improve their looks. We know that after a point you earn your looks and your beauty is earned. Like the above posters, I am in constant awe of your passion, courage and beauty. You go girl and make them wonder what it is that makes the women of the right all so much more beautiful. Courage! BTW, the picture doesn’t really do you justice. I saw you on 9-11 and you really are gorgeous. (Maureen Dowdy, eat your heart (?) out!)

Bruce Godfrey
Bruce Godfrey
13 years ago

The “journalistic credentials” is simply a shout-out to the armies of Columbia J-School grads who cannot find jobs in a bad economy and an internet age to remind them, above all, that Atlas is “Not Our Kind, Dear(s).” Essentially the article is not about Pamela Geller but more about how other people feel about Pamela Geller, smear by hearsay. Had they fact-checked Geller’s actual corpus of work, they would have found the author to be highly opinionated and provocative in tone but accurate in fact which is why they spent so much time chattering about what Media Matters or PayPal or whoever had to say. Had they been able to ding you on your actual journalism, your actual gumshoe work, they would have done so.
It would have been a worthy smear if they had published an article entitled “Top Ten Major Factual Gaffes by Atlas Shrugs’ Pam Geller” but to find ten they would first had to have found one.

h84izlamm
h84izlamm
13 years ago

We can only hope one of us has infiltrated the New York ‘Slimes!

Shane Atwell
Shane Atwell
13 years ago

Great picture. Just about discredits the article on its own. Love ya Pam. Don’t get too upset about mainstream media. Nobody reads it anymore.

Andrew
Andrew
13 years ago

He, he, he, he, I don’t know if Pamela is a socialite dilettante or not …. but there is no doubt in my mind that she is a 24 carat babe, a pound of ‘D’ ‘FL’ diamond darlingness and a platinum brunette princess.
And coming from New Zealand I can say that I love her accent – regardless of which part of your east coast it comes from!

poetcomic1
poetcomic1
13 years ago

I love the image of Pamela Geller as ditzy dilettante without ‘proper journalistic credentials’. A woman who puts her life on the line 24 hours a day. Most Marines would hesitate to do what you do and confront the enemies that you confront.

underzog
underzog
13 years ago

Is that the picture they took of Pamela?
It is a real nice one. Media Matters (run by self confessed liar, David Brock) gets Pamela shutdown on the drive by media, at least Hannity on Fox News will have her on (I hope).

Canada Calling
Canada Calling
13 years ago

Pamela, they wouldn’t bother to do a hit piece if you weren’t so effective, and, as the “70% of Americans against the Ground Zero mosque” figure shows, ordinary Americans are waking up.
Here in Canada we’ve been gently pushing back for a few years. The first big success was when the Province of Ontario rejected legislation that would have seen parts of Sharia enforced by the Ontario Courts.
Nonetheless I found myself being subjected to Sharia law last week at Toronto International Airport when a cabbie refused to lift my duty-free liquor bag into the trunk of the cab where he’d just put my suitcase. When he pointed to the bag on the ground and said in broken english “you please.”, I said “I understand”. I then pulled my suitcase out of the trunk and got another cab.
I understood that either he was going to adapt to Canadian standards, or I was going to adopt Islamic standards.
I “understood” because of your efforts Pamela, and other good people who first understood the danger and made it their mission to educate the public.
Thank you and keep up the good fight against Islamists who want to destroy our freedoms by imposing their standards on our western societies.

Bruriah Sarah
Bruriah Sarah
13 years ago

Pamela, if you feel that the NYTimes has slandered you, I know you are a busy lady, but I think you may want to sue them for defamation of character. If the NY Times has egg on its face, it might tread a little more carefully in the future.

wri7913
wri7913
13 years ago

There is only one thing I have to say about NYT…….. Jayson Blair.
It’s why I don’t read the NYT’s anymore, EVAH!!
I’m surprised they are still in business to be honest. I’m sure if it wasn’t for the US Military reading them to find out what the enemy thinks, they would have gone out of business after the Jayson Blair episode.

elvis
elvis
13 years ago

There is no G()d but The New York Times and Islam is its messenger.
[/…all the news that fits.]

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!