Kosovo: “The calculation was simple. Bombing a Christian nation could be done with relative impunity…”

The American people deserve an explanation as to why we chose to aid the jihad against the Christians in Kosovo. Instead, they are fed more lies, more taqiyya, in the efforts of dhimmi Western leaders to declare Kosovo an independent state, an Islamic state in the heart of Europe.

Pro-freedom, pro-American statesman like John Bolton know what's at stake here. That is what America needs in the White House, not a stooge for jihad.

Julia Gorin exposes more:

“The calculation was simple. Bombing a Christian nation could be done with relative impunity…Kosovo will be a thorn in the side of Europe and the US as Muslim gratitude takes its usual turn toward hostility. The infidels served their purpose and are no longer useful.”

A flashback to an article written in 2004. I sometimes do a “flashback” blog, when I find something from the past to be searingly accurate in light of subsequent events, or if something was so trenchantly put that it bears repeating. Or if it describes a phenomenon I’ve observed myself in the way that the Balkans are handled in the U.S. This article does all three. It was originally published on a site called “therant.us,” which isn’t around anymore.

The Kosovo We Don’t Know, April 29, 2004

by Tony Rubolotta

The recent killing of two Americans [and shooting of 11 others on their first day of duty in Kosovo] by a Jordanian, all serving with the UN police force (UNMIK) in Kosovo has temporarily brought the region to the front page, where the major media quickly linked the incident to Iraq, and then dropped Kosovo back into obscurity. The fact is things are not going well in Kosovo and the major media has several reasons for keeping the covers on the story.

What most Americans know about Kosovo is what Bill Clinton and his media cheering section told them in 1999. It was reported that Christian Serbs were engaged in a massive campaign of ethnic cleansing against Muslim Albanians. “Evidence” of a massacre in Racak was presented to back the claim. With popular, political and media support solidifying behind him, Clinton gave Serbia an ultimatum. Serbia refused, Clinton bombed, NATO occupied, the media reported and Hollywood even produced a few movies to further demonize the Serbs and fuel the propaganda.

With little or no news coming out of Kosovo now, we must assume that thanks to Bill Clinton, Kosovo is a thriving, peaceful democracy protecting the rights of all religious groups. Well, that’s about as big a lie as what we were told about Kosovo in the first place. [Note, almost word-for-word, to this day that’s still the official line: “Kosovo is now an independent and multi-ethnic state, in which democracy and law are ruling, and citizen’s rights are respected.” — Gazmend Barbullusi, Albania’s ambassador to the Netherlands, repeated ad nauseum by U.S. officials]

The Racak massacre was the breaking point Clinton used to rally support for the war. With hundreds of published articles about Racak, what do we really know about the “massacre”?

We know Serb forces engaged and defeated KLA forces in Racak in a classic firefight, an event witnessed by French and AP news crew on January 15. We don’t know how many casualties were inflicted. The Serbs and news crew left and the KLA resumed control of Racak. The following day 45 bodies were found in a gully with the help of KLA guides. Forty victims were autopsied by a Finnish forensic team dispatched by the EU. The EU report refuted claims the victims were all shot at close range and mutilated. The report never used the word massacre and only found one victim shot at close range, maybe.

The Washington Post, claiming to have the EU report findings leaked by an “unidentified western source” wrote a story that misrepresented and extrapolated the findings. The Post claimed the forensic evidence proved the victims were executed in a massacre, which it did not. The head of the EU forensic team refuted the story. The AP and USA Today, not to be outdone by the Post, added detail and gore that was never proven. In contrast, Le Monde, with journalists at the scene, questioned the credibility of the entire scenario. They raised questions any good investigator should have asked, but were never answered.

With hundreds of articles on Racak, it doesn’t take long to determine that most are biased one way or the other. Articles that stick to the facts are very short and few, because the facts are short and few. In the end, the evidentiary requirement we use to convict criminals, “beyond a reasonable doubt,” was never met for Racak. None the less, the United States and NATO were going to war over an alleged, unproven and potentially staged massacre of 45 people.

Kosovo was having a civil war with about 2,000 casualties per year, about equally divided between the warring factions. What most Americans don’t know is that the struggle dates back to 1389 when the Muslim Turks defeated the Christian Serbs and occupied Kosovo. Control of Kosovo has seesawed for 600 years, but it has been largely a history of persecuting Christians, first under the Turks and later by their Albanian successors. Atrocities occur during civil wars, but the scale of this war was a tempest in a teapot compared to other conflicts in the world.

What was the calculation and motivation for US involvement in the affairs of Serbia?

The calculation was simple. Bombing a Christian nation could be done with relative impunity. There would be no “Christian” outrage as there might be in the Muslim world if Serbia were Muslim. War on Serbia would endear us to Muslims for intervening on behalf of a Muslim cause. Milosevic was not that popular in Serbia and his support would melt away under pressure. Serbia, a moderately developed country, would provide a “target rich” environment. The Serbs, proud and protective of their culture, would submit to prevent its destruction. Popular support in the US and Europe would survive a short and apparently bloodless campaign.

Serbia was bombed and surrendered. Clinton claimed victory. NATO occupation forces moved in. The UN police force took their positions. Milosevic was put on trial. All was well in Kosovo and it dropped from the radar screen. Clinton’s legacy as a champion of human rights, influential diplomat and great wartime president was secured. In fact, it was only secure as long as no one knew what was happening in Kosovo, hence the news blackout by the major media in the US and most, but not all of Europe.

The Kosovo civil war continues, but this time the Albanian Muslims have the upper hand and the NATO/UNMIK forces appear incapable of intervention. Serbian Christians are being killed and driven from Kosovo. Christian churches and monasteries are being systematically destroyed. Kosovo, like Albania and Bosnia is being turned into an Islamic terrorist base. Crime is rampant and the economy, except for the drug-trade, is stagnant. Kosovo is moving toward independence as a Muslim state with plans for eventual union with Albania. Investigation of Serb atrocities by the Hague War Crimes Tribunal have found the claims greatly exaggerated or non-existent. Kosovo will be a thorn in the side of Europe and the US as Muslim gratitude takes its usual turn toward hostility. The infidels served their purpose and are no longer useful.

And the motive for intervention in Kosovo? I don’t think you have to look any further than the character of Bill Clinton and his media buddies.

And all that will help in case anyone is confused about how we got to here:

John Bolton advised U.S. President to attribute more attention to South Caucasus (June 27, 2011)

…Bolton stressed that Russia persistently tries to restore its influence on the region…According to the politician, Obama’s administration must openly support Azerbaijan in the context to Karabakh conflict settlement, since except Armenian and Azerbaijani sides it involves Russia as well. “We must not forget Russia’s assault of Georgia of August 2008. Russia aims at restoring its influence over the region…”

That is, after we started a concerted campaign to usurp influence in the region, including with an air assault on a Slavic country and with infiltration of jihadists into the neighborhood.

There isn’t much that a great man like John Bolton — who did oppose America’s Kosovo mischief — can be faulted for. But if even he has grafted the Clinton/McCain/Bush/Clark line on the 2008 Georgia war — in which Georgia was the very clear aggressor — then there just isn’t much hope. (Never mind that we supported Georgia in doing far worse than what we bombed Serbia for doing.)

Please let’s not kid ourselves about who pressed Russia’s “Go” button. And continues to press it. Treacherous U.S. leadership — from Bush I to Clinton to Bush II to Obama/Clinton.

As for Azerbaijan, it’s just a little rich of us to create the precedent for Karabakh secession, then turn around and support the opposite: territorial integrity. That is, after supporting Muslim Albanian separatism against Christian Serbian sovereignty, we’re being asked to support Muslim Azerbaijan’s sovereignty over Christian Armenian separatism in Karabakh. While I recognize that Karabakh separatism is exactly the kind of chaos I was hoping to avoid by opposing the Kosovo precedent, it’s a wee bit much to expect to have our cake and eat it too — and not get fat.

After poking Russia in the eye for the past two decades, we are being asked to contradict ourselves in Azerbaijan — in order to poke Russia in the eye again. That’s after baiting Russia into doing exactly what it’s doing there. Don’t take my word for it. Take Silvio Berlusconi’s, Daniel Larisen’s, Scott Taylor’s, Jim Jatras’s, Thomas Meaney’s, Harris Mylonas’s, Lech Walesa’s, George Jonas’s, Joseph Farah’s, Rod Dreher’s, Pat Buchanan’s, Paul J. Saunders’, J. Victor Marshall’s, Dmitri Simes’, Javier Solana’s, Andrew Sullivan’s, Gale Stokes’, Sir Ivor Roberts’, Ted Galen Carpenter’s, Gordon M. Bardos’s, Tim Marshall’s, George Galloway’s, Georgia’s itself, Boston Globe’s, Newsweek’s, or even the the Council on Foreign Relations’ or NY Times’ — to name just a few. “Russia’s” war games are all NATO’s in origin.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

9 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

juniper

12 years ago

The only rationale behind the US commieobama government’s actions are to destroy America’s economy, frighten away all her allies so no one trusts her, and make all nations hate her for senseless interventions like declaring war on Gaddafy!! Even antagonising Russia and appeasing Iran, which in the real world are utterly pointless and vile, fits in with the desire to completely fuck up the balance of the world. Obama does not care because it is America that will suffer, while American people’s money will support him and his troop of monstrous traitors till the end of their days. They are vampires!

0

11B40

12 years ago

Greetings:
My take on muslim “gratitude” is that it’s like a Missouri/Warhol River; a verbal mile wide, an actual inch deep, and lasting for about 15 minutes.

0

Xavier823

12 years ago

Of course Clinton bombed the Christians in favor of the Muslims both he and Hillary are bought and paid for by the Saudis. Hillary was even bold enough to take on a Muslim brotherhood spy as her aid. As far as I am concerned they both sold their souls and are traitors to their religion and country.

0

concerned

12 years ago

Russia was often compared to a Bear – being strong, dangerous and cunning.
On the other hand, America is evoking an image of a Bull – being strong, dangerous and dump.

0

Radegunda

12 years ago

Except it isn’t their religion. The Bible that Clinton carried was all to dupe Middle America.

0

concerned

12 years ago

… being strong, dangerous and dumb.

0

southwood

12 years ago

Adultery isn’t anything to do with Christianity. But as for Kosovo – it is a big mess now. It’s run by a murderous Mafia and is the main channel for the smuggling of Opium into Europe from Afghanistan. Give it back to the Serbs, I say. Some hope ! BTW many of the ordinary Kosovans are disillusioned with what independence has brought them.

0

 Max

12 years ago

Why Is NATO In Yugoslavia?http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GER108A.html

0

Blair

12 years ago

Internet is a great invention as in the 21st century nazies can get away with publishing racist articles’ which are scandalous even by Hitler standards.
knock yourself out

0