Grover Must Go

Grover
Must Go
By Robert Spencer

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) has become the latest
Republican politician to see the writing on the wall and break with anti-tax
guru Grover Norquist. America has voted for socialism, and socialism is what it
is going to get, and the statesmanlike Saxby is not going to be the one who stands
athwart history and shouts, “Stop!” And yet, as craven as Chambliss’s
capitulation to the forces of unrestrained government power is – and it is
craven indeed – there is one thing the august Georgia solon has right: it’s
time to break with Grover Norquist.

“I care more about this country than I do about a
20-year-old pledge,” Chambliss thundered piously. “If we do it his way, then we’ll
continue in debt, and I just have a disagreement with him about that.” In other
words, there is no chance whatsoever to rein in the ever-galloping growth of
government spending, and so Americans are just going to have to pony up more to
feed the socialist leviathan. After all, we can’t expect that people will
perform key services like reading our emails or making sure we aren’t drinking
sugary drinks for free. And Saxby Chambliss, part of the ever spineless,
gutless, clueless, directionless, visionless Republican establishment, is going
to make sure they are duly remunerated for their service to Big Brother.

Norquist’s response was an indication of how utterly the anti-tax idol has
failed. “Senator Chambliss,” he huffed, “promised the people of Georgia he
would go to Washington and reform government rather than raise taxes to pay for
bigger government. He made that commitment in writing to the people of Georgia.”
Yet while the good people of Georgia may really want to reform government
rather than raise taxes to pay for bigger government, the majority of their
countrymen do not. In 1984, Walter Mondale’s promise to raise taxes was the
kiss of death for his presidential campaign; in 2012, after over twenty years
of Grover Norquist’s anti-tax crusade, Barack Obama made raising taxes the
linchpin of his campaign, and was decisively reelected.

Not only has Norquist spectacularly failed to convince the American people
that an out-of-control megastate that confiscates the fruit of the labors of
the industrious is to be rejected; he has also tied the Republican Party to a
disastrously self-defeating posture toward Islamic supremacism. Rep. Frank Wolf
(R-VA) called Norquist out for this on the House floor in October 2011, saying
of the anti-tax hero: “Documentation shows that he has deep ties to supporters
of Hamas and other terrorist organizations that are sworn enemies of the United
States and our ally Israel.” He pointed out that “around the years 2000
and 2001, Mr. Norquist’s firm represented Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was
convicted two years later for his role in a terrorist plot and who is presently
serving a 23-year sentence in federal prison.”

Norquist, reported Wolf, “also associated with terror financier Sami
Al-Arian, according to Mary Jacoby’s reporting in March 2003, in the St.
Petersburg Times. Al-Arian pled guilty in 2006 ‘to a charge of
conspiring to provide services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a
specially designated terrorist organization, in violation of U.S. law,’ and is
under house arrest, according to a Department of Justice press
release. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s ‘paramilitary wing—the al-Quds
Brigades—has conducted numerous attacks, including large-scale suicide
bombings,’ according to the National Counterterrorism Center.”
 
These are the kinds of people for whom Norquist opened doors. Norquist,
said Wolf, “served as a key facilitator between Al-Arian, Alamoudi and the
White House.…In June 2001, Al-Arian was among the members of the American
Muslim Council invited to the White House complex.…The next month, the
National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom — a civil liberties group
headed by Al-Arian — gave Norquist an award for his work to abolish the use of
secret intelligence evidence in terrorism cases.”
 
Wolf also pointed out that Norquist tied his anti-tax work to his agitation for
Islamic supremacist causes: he “even used Americans for Tax Reform to circulate
a petition in support of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque,’ ” which 70% of Americans
opposed. “Why would Americans for Tax Reform,” Wolf asked, “circulate a
petition in support of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque?’  For the families of
those who lost loved ones on 9/11 or during operations in the War on Terror,
concerns about the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ were neither a ploy nor a distraction,
as Norquist described it.”
 
Meanwhile, for fear of crossing Norquist and losing his favor, Republicans for
years have been turning a blind eye to all his ties to shady Muslim individuals
and groups. If they signed his tax pledge, they were effectively pledging also
not to make trouble about the access and influence he was facilitating for people
linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. Thus was removed the only possible effective
counterweight to the Democrats’ active collaboration with Islamic supremacists.

But now Norquist has failed. Taxes are going up. Opposing new taxes is not a
winning issue in elections. The Republican Party, after being unable or
unwilling to offer a genuine choice, rather than an echo, to the Democrats’
socialist pandering, is in well-deserved ruins. But there may be a silver
lining. What is left of the American opposition now has a chance to jettison
not only Norquist’s failed tax pledge, as Chambliss has done, but also come out
against his enabling of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration. Why should this failed
tax crusader continue to hold the loyal opposition hostage?

Of course, there may be a few politicians out there who genuinely oppose Big
Government, and want to come out publicly against further tax increases. More
power to them, I say, and I hope they have solid job prospects in the private
sector. But in the meantime, for their convenience I offer, as an alternative
to Norquist’s toxic cocktail of No Taxes Plus Collaboration with Islamic
Supremacists, a genuinely pro-freedom tax pledge. Call it the Robert Spencer
Tax Pledge. Here it is: “I solemnly pledge to oppose new tax increases, to work
to cut existing tax rates, and to
oppose Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government and the concomitant
dismantling of our resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism.”

There. I invite any and all politicians to take that pledge. So now
Republicans (and Democrats) can’t say they have no alternative to Grover
Norquist. It’s time for new approaches, and so here is one.

Meanwhile, a toast to Saxby Chambliss. He may be just another self-serving
hack feeding at the public trough, but he has managed to do the right thing,
even if by accident: he has thrown off the deleterious influence of the
thoroughly compromised Norquist. For that alone, even though he did it for the
wrong reasons, he may one day deserve to be called a statesman.

Robert Spencer is the
director of Jihad Watch and author of
the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam
(and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Did Muhammad Exist?.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

9 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

ChristianForIsrael

11 years ago

Mr. Spencer, your new pledge will never be taken by anyone in representational office, as you must know.
“I solemnly pledge to oppose new tax increases, to work to cut existing tax rates, and to oppose Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government and the concomitant dismantling of our resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism.”
This statement raises liberal red flags as soon as “.. oppose Muslim Brotherhood …”
However, I would suggest from now on that we, all of us, begin to consistently refer to the terms “Muslim Supremacy”, “Islamic Supremacy”, “Koranic Supremacists”. And to “Jewaphobia”, and “ChristianityPhobia”.
Womenaphobia, Feminenphobia is REAL and operating in Islam every minute.
The “phobia” labels have been used by the ultraliberals and IGNORANT for too long, and quite inaccurately.
Yet “Jewaphobia” and “ChristianityPhobia” is what our own media outlets regurgitate to us ceaselessly.
And I am SERIOUSLY saying we need to start employing with complete accuracy “Muslim Supremacy”, “Islamic Supremacy”, “Koranic Supremacists”

0

ChristianForIsrael

11 years ago

Spencer, I sense a bit of “tongue-in-cheek” with “..to oppose Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government and the concomitant dismantling of our resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism.”
Sadly, you know that even too many “Conservatives” do not see any threat or are undisturbed by the inroads made by “peaceful” Muslim action groups.
For “concomitant” I would suggest “accompanying lockstep” as in “.. the accompanying lockstep dismantling of our resistance…
Heh, heh … I like to use concomitant, myself, but only when I am sure my listener or reader knows the word immediately.

0

John C. Barile

11 years ago

O my Rabb! You are at your ironic best in sarcastic analysis and embrace of weary realpolitik. Let me add to that, Billions for defense, but NOT ONE CENT for jizya!

0

John C. Barile

11 years ago

Grovidkun Norquisling must go! Ditto Suhail Khan.

0

prestigio

11 years ago

don’t be foolish
it’s certain you can’t
spend your way out of
the current problems
but
you can’t
tax your way out
either
handing more money to
the white house imposter
will only cause him to
spend more

0

sharon

11 years ago

I do agree. America voted for socialism although most didn’t realize. African Americans in huge numbers supported a candidate that will put all of us in chains. The unemployment number among the black population is in double digits, how could he have been re-elected? I say go over the fiscal cliff and give the American people what they voted for.
I am appalled at the number of people I speak with that have no idea that every American worker, in every tax group received a tax cut under Bush. The truly ignorant have overtaken us. The Catholic vote was huge for Obama regardless of the freedom of religion issue.
We fight on against Islam and Shariah Law. We continue to educate. As far as the tax rates? Socialism is the new normal, it was voted for, time for some tough love on what that really means.
In reality, the only group of Americans paying their fair share are the wealthy and the smokers.

0

Patricia Weatherwax

11 years ago

“… he has also tied the Republican Party to a disastrously self-defeating posture toward Islamic supremacism.” And I will never understand why they allowed it. “Norquist tied his anti-tax work to his agitation for Islamic supremacist causes…” And, again, the Republican’s fell for it. You’ve been had, you idiot Republicans, and near to destroyed us in the bargain.

0

Kevin

11 years ago

Well, well, well… looky here….. I was close when I said Geller would accusing Bibi of being Hamas….lol
Gelleroid’s website is now accusing the man who got the no-new-tax pledge going of being tied to Islamic supremacists…. I swear, that bitch could find Hassan-Chop! in a damn box of condoms….lmao…. If people don’t see who this woman is REALLY working for now, I recommend a psychiatrist….

0

David Yuhnke

11 years ago

President Obama’s policies are right in line with those of 1950s and 1960s Republicans. I was a kid when Eisenhower was President and Ike would be ashamed of what has happened to his party today. Our taxes are at the lowest they’ve been since the 1950s. The Corporate tax rate was at 91% under Eisenhower and everyone was thriving. The only socialism I see today is Corporate socialism, with giant multinational corporations being give huge tax breaks at the expense of the people. The current administration has been and is spending less than has been spent for government in the past fifty years. When Jimmy Carter left office in 1981, the national debt was $900 billion.
When Ronald Reagan left office in 1989, the national debt was $2.6 trillion.
When George H.W. Bush left office in 1993, the national debt was $4 trillion.
When Bill Clinton left office in 2001, the national debt was $5 trillion.
When George W. Bush left office in 2009, the national debt was $11.6 trillion.
Since Barack Obama has been in office, he’s increased the debt by $3 trillion, 90% of which was to rescue us from the crash caused by 30 years of irresponsible spending.
Therefore, the recession was all Obama’s fault.

0