The 6 Republican senators who will decide the Supreme Court fight

32

The ruthless Democrats plan a full court press against the weak RINO’s, to block President Trump’s SCOTUS pick from being confirmed. Any Republican Senator that does not vote for Trump’s new SCOTUS pick should be primaried. In addition, if Trump’s SCOTUS pick is not confirmed the Republicans will almost certainly lose the Senate in November. That means President Trump will not be able to confirm one judge in the first two years of his second term.

The 6 Republican senators who will decide the Supreme Court fight

By Politico, September 9, 2020

Story continues below advertisement

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death on Friday kicked off what is sure to be the most consequential Supreme Court confirmation fight in decades — and puts a spotlight on the handful of senators whose votes will determine the future of the court.

The universe of potential swing votes in the Senate is surprisingly small considering how high the stakes are. The following senators will be under enormous pressure — from Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and President Donald Trump — to either fall in line, or break from their party in the most dramatic fashion.

McConnell’s decision to hold a vote on Ginsburg’s replacement forces him to balance his long-standing desire to cement a conservative legacy in the federal judiciary, while also retaining his power as majority leader.

That there are so few potentially in play lawmakers reflects the hyperpartisan nature of the political landscape in 2020. With less than 45 days left until the election, both sides have largely retreated to their respective sides.

In the coming days, these senators will be forced to answer several important questions. Would you vote to confirm a Supreme Court nominee before the election? If a confirmation vote is held in the lame-duck period, would your decision hinge on whether the presidency and the Senate flip?

With 53 Republicans in the Senate, McConnell can afford to lose only three votes. Vice President Mike Pence could break a 50-50 tie if needed. Here’s who to watch:

The true swing votes

During Trump’s impeachment trial, these GOP senators — Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah — were among those deciding whether the trial would feature testimony from witnesses, as Democrats had been pushing.

This time around, the “Three Amigos” are equally as important, and they each find themselves with a slew of factors to consider.

Collins recently told The New York Times that she would not vote in favor of a Supreme Court justice in October — “I think that’s too close, I really do” — and would oppose seating a new justice in the lame-duck period if Joe Biden defeats Trump.

 

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DemocracyRules2
DemocracyRules2
3 years ago

Biden Accused Of Hypocrisy After 2016 Comments In Favor Of Supreme Court Confirmation During Election Year
https://www.oann.com/biden-accused-of-hypocrisy-after-2016-comments-in-favor-of-supreme-court-confirmation-during-election-year/
Biden, NYT, 2016:
“I made it absolutely clear I would go forward with a confirmation process as chairman, even a few months before a presidential election, if the nominee were chosen with the advice and not merely the consent of the Senate, just as the Constitution requires.”

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago

LOL, double standards the kind Dem0rats go with, but only when they can’t embrace triple values.

DemocracyRules2
DemocracyRules2
3 years ago

Biden Accused Of Hypocrisy After 2016 Comments In Favor Of Supreme Court Confirmation During Election Year
https://www.oann.com/biden-accused-of-hypocrisy-after-2016-comments-in-favor-of-supreme-court-confirmation-during-election-year/
Biden, NYT, 2016:
“I made it absolutely clear I would go forward with a confirmation process as chairman, even a few months before a presidential election, if the nominee were chosen with the advice and not merely the consent of the Senate, just as the Constitution requires.”

DemocracyRules2
DemocracyRules2
3 years ago

Biden Accused Of Hypocrisy After 2016 Comments In Favor Of Supreme Court Confirmation During Election Year
https://www.oann.com/biden-accused-of-hypocrisy-after-2016-comments-in-favor-of-supreme-court-confirmation-during-election-year/
Biden, NYT, 2016:
“I made it absolutely clear I would go forward with a confirmation process as chairman, even a few months before a presidential election, if the nominee were chosen with the advice and not merely the consent of the Senate, just as the Constitution requires.”

DemocracyRules2
DemocracyRules2
3 years ago

Biden Accused Of Hypocrisy After 2016 Comments In Favor Of Supreme Court Confirmation During Election Year
https://www.oann.com/biden-accused-of-hypocrisy-after-2016-comments-in-favor-of-supreme-court-confirmation-during-election-year/
Biden, NYT, 2016:
“I made it absolutely clear I would go forward with a confirmation process as chairman, even a few months before a presidential election, if the nominee were chosen with the advice and not merely the consent of the Senate, just as the Constitution requires.”

DemocracyRules2
DemocracyRules2
3 years ago

President Trump hosts rally in N.C., pledges to pick a woman Supreme Court nominee
https://www.oann.com/president-trump-hosts-rally-in-n-c-pledges-to-pick-a-woman-supreme-court-nominee/

Don39
Don39
3 years ago

He can pick all day and that is all he can do. He must at least nominate someone because it is his duty. Then we will see how strong McConnell and and the Republican Senate are. We will see who the real RINOs and hypocrits are!

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

Ted Cruz says they have enough votes. And Barbara Lagoa would be hard to vote down, since the Senate just approved her last fall for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals with a 80-15 majority. That means that many Dems voted for her:

“Lagoa spent more than a decade as a judge on an intermediate appeals court in Florida. Then she went to Florida’s Supreme Court, where she spent less than a year. Then she was nominated by Trump to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in September of 2019. She got a lot of bipartisan support in the Senate, and she was confirmed by in an 80-15 vote in November of 2019.”

Don39
Don39
3 years ago
Reply to  DemocracyRules

Democrats do not vote for conservatives ever and especially when nominated by a conservative president that they hate and fought for three years to include continuous attempts to impeach!

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

Well a bunch of Democrats voted for Lagoa, because she is a woman and a Latina. They voted she was qualified. NOW they will have to vote that this same woman is NOT qualified. Of course the Dems can do that, but will be awkward.

70% of the electorate say they want someone appointed to SCOTUS asap.

Dathan A. Paterno
Dathan A. Paterno
3 years ago

I see only 3.

SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
3 years ago

I guess Pam just had a Biden episode 🙂 lol
Keep Pamela Great

Don39
Don39
3 years ago

You to!

Don39
Don39
3 years ago

Maybe you should take the blinders off.

Dathan A. Paterno
Dathan A. Paterno
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

Please tell me who the other three are besides Collins, Murkowski, and Romney.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
3 years ago

comment image

Fount
Fount
3 years ago

The faces of treason. Know their despicable names. Everyone a Janus.

MAS
MAS
3 years ago

Collins even looks like a Democrat Jezebel. Maybe she should just change her party…

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago
Reply to  MAS

My nickname for Collins is “Shaky” because of her palsy.

Don39
Don39
3 years ago
Reply to  MAS

And that would help the right how!?

very old white guy
very old white guy
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

I am guessing that MAS thinks that at least she would be honest.

MAS
MAS
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

It would remove a Democrat mole…

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago

I almost crapped all over myself yesterday when a discussion came up on this subject on Fox News yesterday and one of their talking heads referred to Romney as a “conservative”.

He’s about as much a conservative as I am the Pope.

Don39
Don39
3 years ago

FOX NEWS has become part of the problem! Even Pres. Trump told Lavine that just yesterday. I saw it some time ago. The real FOX News has always been anti-Trump! They are in Soros’ pocket and are only allowed to hint at truth!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago
Reply to  Don39

Agreed. Fox News has more liberals on its payroll than all the others networks have conservatives combined.

mtman2
mtman2
3 years ago

Romney is what he needs to be for Mitt…!

Ronald Nuxon
Ronald Nuxon
3 years ago

At this juncture, with or without Romney (whom I think will come to confirm), the president’s selection for the Supreme Court is in the bag.

James Stamulis
James Stamulis
3 years ago

They are RINO’s not real Republicans and they work for the Cabal.

CreoleGumbo
CreoleGumbo
3 years ago

Who are the other 3?

Dathan A. Paterno
Dathan A. Paterno
3 years ago
Reply to  CreoleGumbo

Right?

Dustin John
Dustin John
3 years ago

Which ones will back stab their voters like McCain did in his last vote?

stephen5970
stephen5970
3 years ago

As Ginsburg once pointed out, the president is president until he isn’t, and can act as the president. An upcoming election does not change anything. Susan Collins of Maine an Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, to me, are acting as moral stone walls on a principal that doesn’t exist.

Mitt Romney of Utah has shown himself to be a fool, usually caught in the headlights and making himself even more of a fool. He doesn’t like Trump. When he needed Trump, he was all friendly, but the second Romney was re-elected the backstabbing knives came out. If it was a vote to save the country, and Trump was president, count on Romney to vote against the Republican position. I can’t see the people of Utah ever re-electing him, and the majority of the Republicans will shun him – if they haven’t already starting doing so.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!